Letters like these that make me wonder if bishops have really done their research with regards to mandating any aspect of liturgy. Also, I strongly doubt that the bishop can prevent the ordinary of the Mass from being sung in Latin according to traditional and approved chants. I am certain that the Graduale Romanum, for example, may be used at any Mass in place of the responsorial psalm. There are plenty of options already in the Missal, but how “individual” should a parish be allowed to go before they no longer resemble in practice the Church in the next town?Īs I have remarked before, I do not think that a bishop has the authority to impose a single Mass setting on parishes. Before it was introduced by a few no one missed it as it did not exist. I know of one person who no longer attends Mass at Midnight Christmas Mass, the one time he went, because of it. For some the peace offering is more than enough (and even that is an option, not mandated) and the hand holding is just over the top.
As for the hand holding it does make many uncomfortable and as one post noted some go out of their way to make you feel as if you have done something wrong if wishing to not partake in it. You are supposed to feel at home in any Church. I think the Bishop is right by asking for a more uniform practice so when people come from other parishes or are travelling when they come to Church the practices are generally the same from place to place and no one feels they are in a completely different setting from what they are used to. In all this liturgical translation BS I find no credible foundation, no basis for offering “an explanation to anyone who asks you for a reason for your hope” (1 Peter 3:15) If our liturgy is not about this, it is surely pointless. If, as you state in the opening of your letter, many experience the liturgical life of the church and its changes as inconsequential…maybe you are contributing to such a sad disposition. What does the introduction of a new English translation have to do with these issues? Why make, what you admit to be a tense moment, even more so… even absurd. Well what is it bishop, what is your standard of liturgical correctness? More importantly, why does it matter?! How can the instruction for the faithful not to hold hands at the Our Father be based upon absolute adherence to the letter of the GIRM, but the use of the choir loft “That choirs and other musicians use choir lofts in churches that are structured as such, while not mandated, is strongly recommended.” The laity are neither mandated nor not mandated in their posture at the Our Father.
Sspx kentucky professional#
Robinson's superiors asked him to engage in the work of Catholic education at Our Lady Help of Christians Academy in Colorado.What kind of shenanigans and tomfoolery are these professional clerics up to?
During this time, he also published a book on philosophical realism, entitled The Realist Guide to Religion and Science. He spent ten years in the Southern Hemisphere, teaching a variety of courses, but particularly dogmatic theology and Thomistic metaphysics. In 2009, he was transferred to Australia to be a professor at Holy Cross Seminary in Goulburn, New South Wales. During his three-year tenure there, he taught eighth and eleventh grade religion, as well as philosophy to seniors and first year students of the college. Robinson's first priestly assignment was as a teacher at the Society of St. After six years of seminary formation, he was ordained to the priesthood on June 23, 2006.įr. Thomas Aquinas Seminary in Winona, Minnesota, in the fall of 2000.
Then, wishing to discern his vocation with the Society of St. He worked for two years in the field with Lexmark International in Lexington, Kentucky. After completing his high school education, he attended the University of Louisville, completing a Master's in Engineering Mathematics and Computer Science in 1998. Robinson grew up in Louisville, Kentucky. Paul Robinson was appointed principal of OLCHA in 2019.įr.